Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

What complaint trends mean for life insurance buyers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that buying life cover is not only about finding the lowest premium. For New Zealand households, the real test of a policy often comes years later, when a claim is made and the insurer checks whether the policy terms have been met. - read more

Why insurance complaint trends matter before you need to claim

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that the real test of any policy comes at claim time. For New Zealand households relying on regular wages, the issue is especially important when the cover is designed to replace income after illness or injury. - read more

What Stronger Conduct Expectations Mean for Income Protection Customers

28 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

New Zealand’s financial conduct regime continues to reshape expectations for insurers, with the Financial Markets Authority keeping close attention on whether financial institutions can demonstrate fair outcomes for customers. For people who rely on Income Protection Insurance, the shift is more than a compliance story. It affects how policies are explained, how claims are handled, and how insurers monitor whether customers are receiving value from their cover. - read more

Northern Strata Schemes Face Fresh Scrutiny on Cyclone Cover

25 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh review of Australia’s cyclone reinsurance pool has put northern strata insurance affordability back in focus, particularly for apartment buildings and mixed-use schemes exposed to cyclone, flood and storm surge risk. The pool was designed to improve insurer capacity and ease premium pressure in cyclone-prone regions, but the latest discussion suggests that outcomes are still uneven for complex strata properties. - read more

Why Insurance Tax Reform Is Back in Focus for Small Operators

25 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A renewed industry push to reduce or remove state-based insurance taxes has put affordability back in the spotlight for Australian small businesses. For domestic and home service operators, the issue is practical rather than political: when premiums rise, it becomes harder to maintain the cover needed to work safely in clients’ homes, meet contract requirements and protect tools, vehicles and income. - read more

Click for more Insurance News