Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

3

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Sides with Policyholder in Storm Damage Dispute 18 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has favoured a policyholder in a dispute with insurer Auto & General over storm damage. The case involved a collapsed ceiling, initially attributed to a storm by the insurer before an about-face led them to deny the claim. The AFCA decision marks a significant instance where consumer protection mechanisms have countered an insurer's attempt to deny coverage. - read more

Transforming Home Insurance: The Rise of the Home Energy Revolution 17 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The landscape of home insurance policies in Australia stands on the brink of transformation as an increasing number of homes, apartment complexes, and small businesses are projected to integrate solar panels and battery systems by 2050. According to a report from the actuarial consultancy Finity, these homes will evolve into independent power stations, generating and storing their own electricity, marking a pivotal shift in home energy management. - read more

Life Insurers Reevaluate Amid Rising Mental Health Claims 16 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a growing industry concern, the Council of Australian Life Insurers has highlighted an alarming increase in mental health-related claims, which are now the leading cause of total and permanent disability (TPD) claims. The rise has driven insurers to reconsider their current practices and strategies to address this trend. - read more

QBE Highlights the Importance of Adequate Landlord Insurance 15 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Landlords in Australia have been advised by QBE Insurance Group to reassess their insurance coverage, following survey findings that indicate many could encounter financial hardships if their rental operations are interrupted. According to QBE's data, 38% of landlords might face financial challenges should their properties become uninhabitable or rental payments cease for a duration of two to six weeks. - read more

Court Denies E-Scooter Negligence Allegation Against City Council 14 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian court recently ruled in favour of the City of Joondalup, rejecting a negligence claim lodged by an injured e-scooter rider. The Western Australia District Court found the city not liable for an accident involving insurance broker Kirstin Leibbrandt, who collided with a fence post while riding an e-scooter in the Perth suburb of Hillarys. - read more