Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

NSW Building Practitioners Enter a New Insurance Compliance Era

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The commencement of New South Wales’ professional indemnity requirements for registered building practitioners marks a significant compliance shift for the state’s construction sector. From 1 July 2026, relevant practitioners must be indemnified under an insurance policy for work carried out in that capacity, bringing insurance evidence closer to the centre of day-to-day building compliance. - read more

What the Updated Broker Code Means for Insurance Clients

31 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The National Insurance Brokers Association’s revised Insurance Brokers Code of Practice is moving the sector further towards clearer communication, stronger client care and more consistent professional standards. For Australians who rely on insurance brokers to navigate complex cover, the development is more than an industry housekeeping exercise. It goes directly to how clients understand advice, remuneration, service commitments and complaint pathways. - read more

What the Latest Truck Crash Findings Mean for Your Cover

30 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh heavy vehicle crash research from transport insurer NTI has again put a spotlight on the practical causes of serious truck incidents, with speed for the conditions, fatigue, distraction, equipment issues and vehicle fires all remaining central risk themes for Australian operators. For truck owners, fleet managers and owner-drivers, the findings are more than a safety update. They are a reminder that risk management and insurance outcomes are closely connected. - read more

Why truck fire risk deserves a closer insurance review

29 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh round of transport safety coverage has put truck fires back on the risk agenda for Australian operators. While major crashes often attract the most attention, a vehicle fire can be just as disruptive for a business: the truck may be written off, the load may be damaged, a route may be blocked and the operator may lose income while replacement equipment is sourced. - read more

Insurance Complaint Trends Put Claims Preparation Back in Focus

29 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh industry attention on Australian Financial Complaints Authority complaint trends is a timely reminder that insurance value is not only tested when a policy is bought. For trade businesses, the real test often comes when a damaged tool trailer, public liability allegation, stolen equipment claim or storm-affected worksite needs to be resolved quickly so the next job can proceed. - read more

Click for more Insurance News