Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.

The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.

Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."

Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.

AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.

AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.

Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.

This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.

This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.

Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.

Published:Friday, 11th Oct 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

APRA Enforces Additional Capital Requirement on Sovereign Insurance Australia

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has imposed an additional $2 million capital requirement on Sovereign Insurance Australia (SIA), citing significant deficiencies in the insurer's risk management framework and regulatory reporting practices. This action underscores the critical importance of robust risk management within the insurance industry. - read more

Soft Market Conditions Persist in Australian Commercial Insurance Through H1 2026

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian commercial insurance market has maintained its soft stance throughout the first half of 2026, presenting advantageous conditions for buyers. This trend is characterized by stable or declining premiums, expanded insurer capacity, and increased competition across various insurance lines. - read more

2026-27 Federal Budget: Key Impacts on the Australian Insurance Industry

13 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Government's 2026-27 Federal Budget, presented by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, introduces several measures with direct implications for the insurance sector. These initiatives aim to address challenges such as property insurance costs and underinsurance, while certain omissions have raised questions within the industry. - read more

NRMA's Departure from Farm Insurance: What It Means for Australian Farmers

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

In a significant shift within the Australian insurance landscape, NRMA has announced its withdrawal from the farm insurance market, ceasing the sale of new policies as of July 1, 2025. This decision affects both hobby and commercial farm insurance policies, leaving many farmers in search of alternative coverage options. - read more

Achmea and Protected Cropping Australia Join Forces to Support Greenhouse Farmers

12 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Achmea Farm Insurance and Protected Cropping Australia (PCA) have announced a strategic partnership aimed at bolstering risk mitigation and resilience within Australia's protected cropping sector. This collaboration seeks to empower greenhouse and glasshouse growers by providing tailored insurance solutions and fostering knowledge exchange on best practices. - read more

Click for more Insurance News