Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Insurance Code Rewrite Could Lift Standards for Tradies

21 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian tradies could soon see an important shift in how general insurers are expected to communicate, manage claims and resolve disputes, with the industry’s General Insurance Code of Practice moving closer to a major rewrite. - read more

ASIC Warning Highlights Ongoing Delays in Super Death Benefit Claims

21 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

ASIC’s latest warning to superannuation trustees is a timely reminder that life insurance is only as valuable as the claims process behind it. The regulator’s June 2026 progress review found that while many trustees have improved how they manage death benefit claims, some are still moving too slowly on basic service standards for grieving families. - read more

Rural Insurance Costs Face Fresh Scrutiny in Queensland

21 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Insurance affordability in south-west Queensland has moved from local frustration to a national competition issue, after Maranoa MP David Littleproud lodged a formal complaint with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission over sharp premium increases across the region. - read more

Why Policy Exclusions Matter Before a Claim

21 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent Victorian Supreme Court decision is a timely reminder that having property or business interruption cover does not automatically mean every costly disruption will be insured. The case involved a glass reprocessing business whose site was taken over by Victoria’s environmental regulator in early 2020 after concerns about fire hazards, contamination and risks to public health and the environment. - read more

Victoria’s Strata Commission Debate Enters a New Phase

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Victoria’s owners corporation sector has moved into a new stage of reform after the state government released its response to an expert review of the Owners Corporations Act 2006. While the review recommended stronger controls over payments and benefits linked to owners corporation managers, including commission-style arrangements, the government has stopped short of an immediate ban and will undertake further analysis before deciding how far the changes should go. - read more

Click for more Insurance News