Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,� for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

New Crane Cover Highlights the Insurance Gap for High-Risk Trades

24 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A new specialist insurance product for Australian crane and rigging operators is a timely reminder that not every business fits neatly into a standard policy box. ARTes Specialty, working with wholesale provider Mobius Insurance, has launched an integrated crane and rigging policy for the local market, adding to its earlier Australian offerings for commercial loggers and contractors’ plant and equipment. - read more

NSW Budget Puts Insurance Levy Pressure Back on the Table

24 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The latest NSW Budget has reignited debate over the Emergency Services Levy, with insurance industry concern growing that escalating collection forecasts are strengthening the case for reform. For households and businesses already managing higher premiums, the issue is more than a line item in the state accounts. It goes directly to affordability, underinsurance and whether the cost of funding emergency services is being shared fairly. - read more

NSW Insurance Levy Pressure Adds to Salon Cost Concerns

24 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The NSW Budget released on 23 June 2026 has put insurance affordability back in the spotlight, with updated forecasts showing emergency services levy collections are expected to be materially higher than previously projected. For beauty salon owners, skin clinics, nail technicians and mobile beauticians in NSW, the issue is not just a government finance story. - read more

Life Insurance Demand Strengthens as Businesses Reassess Protection Needs

24 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

New market data reported by Plan For Life points to a notable rebound in parts of Australia’s life insurance sector, with individual lump sum insurance new business rising 6.7% across the 2025 calendar year and individual income protection new business increasing 8.3%. While overall risk new business was lower, that decline was attributed largely to group risk sales returning to more normal levels after earlier periods of heightened activity. - read more

New Report Highlights the Cost of Unplanned Business Succession

24 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A new Business Health research report has put a sharp focus on a familiar but often under-managed risk: what happens to a business if its principal suddenly dies or becomes permanently disabled. While the report is centred on Australian financial advice practices, its message applies broadly to SMEs, partnerships and owner-led companies where enterprise value is closely tied to one or two key people. - read more

Click for more Insurance News