Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Rural Crime Concerns Put Farm Assets Back in the Spotlight

16 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Fresh regional reporting on rural crime has brought a familiar farm risk back into view: the loss of machinery, fuel, tools, livestock and stored inputs through theft or unauthorised access. While weather and biosecurity often dominate farm risk discussions, crime can be just as disruptive when it stops work, delays contractors or leaves a producer without essential equipment at a critical point in the season. - read more

Why SME Insurance Confidence Still Needs a Reality Check

16 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

The latest SME insurance research from Vero is a useful reminder that confidence and preparedness are not always the same thing. Many Australian small and medium-sized businesses know insurance is essential, but the harder question is whether their current cover would respond as expected after a major loss, liability claim or interruption. - read more

Why Firmer Cattle Prices Should Trigger an Insurance Check

15 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent rural market reporting has pointed to firmer cattle values across parts of eastern Australia, with improved seasonal confidence, restocker demand and tighter supply helping support prices in a number of saleyards. For producers, stronger prices are welcome after a period of difficult seasonal and cost pressures. But there is also a quieter insurance issue sitting behind the market lift: if livestock values rise, the financial exposure carried by the farm may rise with them. - read more

Softer premiums do not remove the need for sharper cover checks

15 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent commercial insurance market commentary points to a more favourable pricing environment for many Australian business buyers, with competition returning in some lines after several years of tougher renewal conditions. For consultants, this is welcome news, but it should not be mistaken for a signal that professional risk has become simple or low-cost to insure. - read more

Why Cyber Insurance Reviews Are Becoming More Urgent

15 Sep 2026: Paige Estritori

Cyber insurance has moved from a specialist add-on to a mainstream business risk issue. Recent industry commentary points to a more selective market: insurers are examining security controls, data handling and outsourced technology dependencies before offering terms. For many Australian small businesses, that means a renewal is no longer just a price conversation. It is a test of whether the business can show how it prevents, detects and recovers from an incident. - read more

Click for more Insurance News