Cyclone Pool to Address $1.7 Billion in Claims After Alfred's Impact

1

Treasurer Chalmers, speaking from Queensland, emphasized that the government has earmarked about $1.2 billion in the forthcoming budget to aid cyclone-hit communities, focusing on both immediate hardship alleviations and long-term infrastructure rebuilding. This budgetary provision is critical as it supports local communities in their recovery efforts, reinforcing infrastructure, and ensuring that the social safety nets are equipped to handle such crises.

The Insurance Council of Australia has classified the event as a catastrophe, further underpinning the magnitude of the response required. Chalmers noted the ongoing dialogues with insurance providers, acknowledging the potential rise in building costs due to increased demand for reconstruction services, while aiming to contain inflationary pressures.

With insurance premiums already a key driver for inflation, concerns are rising over the potential affordability of insurance in disaster-prone areas. Chalmers emphasized the need for continuous government intervention to mitigate these costs. The cyclone pool, established as a financial safety net, was deemed significant but in need of further impact on insurance premiums.

Expected to announce the 2025-26 budget soon, Chalmers, alongside Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones and MP Daniel Mulino, remains engaged in assessing additional measures stemming from the 2022 floods inquiry. The goal is to bolster market resilience and effectiveness while curbing insurance-related inflation. Despite advancements in affordability and market stability, Chalmers acknowledged the enduring challenges within the insurance sector.

Published:Monday, 7th Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Potential AI Errors: A Looming Challenge for Insurers 24 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori Industry experts are signaling a potential risk for underwriters due to claims arising from inaccuracies produced by artificial intelligence (AI), likening it to the 'silent cyber' phenomenon of the past. Clyde & Co partner, Darryl Smith, highlights the issue, emphasizing how AI inaccuracies could impact various insurance policies, sometimes without immediate detection. - read more

AFCA Supports RAA Insurance in Vehicle Location Dispute 24 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori An insurance dispute over the location of a vehicle culminated in the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) backing RAA Insurance in their decision to deny a claim. The issue surrounded the policyholder's claim that her son’s car was stored in South Australia, while the vehicle was allegedly used and registered in Victoria. - read more

AFCA Sides with Homeowners in Landmark Insurance Dispute Over Property Cracks 22 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori Homeowners recently secured a favourable ruling against their insurer after a water leak led to significant structural damage. After large cracks emerged on their property, Youi initially denied the insurance claim, attributing the damage to pre-existing issues like earth movement and tree root intrusion, both of which are exclusions in their policy. - read more

Climate Change Threatens Australian Suburbs with Unaffordable Insurance 17 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori More than 4% of Australian properties are currently facing heightened risks from natural hazards exacerbated by climate change, rendering insurance coverage often unaffordable or unavailable, according to recent findings by Climate Valuation. An analysis of over 15 million properties across 15,000 suburbs also highlights that an additional 10% are at moderate risk from disasters such as floods, bushfires, tropical cyclones, coastal inundation, and extreme winds. - read more

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up 16 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank. Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling – supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy – the claim was later denied. This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication. - read more